To: National Alliance (national@natvan.com)
American Dissident Voices Broadcast of March 18, 2000
A physician who wants to ascertain the health of a person checks his
weight and blood pressure, listens to his heartbeat and breathing,
examines his skin, and so on. The physician knows what signs to look
for, what measurements to make in order to decide whether his patient is
healthy or ill. He knows what signs are important and which have no
fundamental significance.
If we want to determine the health of a nation, we likewise look for
signs and make measurements. And of course, it's necessary to understand
which signs are the important ones. Most Americans today seem to believe
that the only important signs are economic signs. They believe that if
the stock market is going up, unemployment is low, and people are
spending lots of money, everything is rosy. Which is to say, if they are
economically comfortable, if they can buy the things they want, they are
inclined to believe that the nation is healthy.
Of course, they do worry a little about the schools: about the continual
lowering of standards, about the substitution of more and more Mickey
Mouse courses in the place of history and mathematics and grammar. They
have an occasional flash of worry that we may be raising a less
competent generation than the one before. But, hey, the economy is okay,
so don't worry. They believe that we can spend more money on the
schools, and that'll make up for the lower standards and the watered
down curriculum.
They may become a little depressed when they look at the array of
candidates running for public office. The polls show that approximately
half the electorate is willing to vote for a loyal member of the gang
which gave us the Bill and Monica show and which last year willfully
slaughtered White women and children in Belgrade for no good reason. And
the other candidate really is not much better. He also would have
unleashed the cruise missiles on the women and children of Belgrade in
order to teach that guy Slobodan a lesson in dee-mo-cra-cee, rather than
risk the wrath of Madeleine and her tribesmen, who had demanded the war
against Serbia. Well, contemplating the candidates is depressing, but
the malls are still full of shiny stuff waiting to be bought, and the
limit hasn't been reached on the credit card yet, so the country must
still be healthy.
The average citizen certainly has misgivings when he reflects on the
increasing darkening of America's racial complexion: when he notes, as
Atlanta Braves pitcher John Rocker did, that fewer and fewer of the
people he sees and hears on the sidewalks of our cities speak English or
look like the sort of people he grew up with. But all of the media
bosses and the politicians and even his priest or minister assure him
that more diversity is good for America, that it strengthens our
economy. So the country must be healthier than ever. Right?
No, not right. Judging the health of a nation by how much shiny junk is
for sale in the shopping malls and how much the average citizen can
charge on his credit card is like judging the health of a man on the
basis of whether or not his shoes are shined and his fingernails are
clean.
There are several things which are important to the health of a nation,
and these things have relatively little to do with shopping malls and
credit cards. Natural resources are important, of course. A country rich
in minerals and land and timber and fresh water is better off than one
with fewer natural resources -- other things being equal. Of course, it
is seldom that other things are equal. The countries of Black Africa
have enormously rich natural resources, but health-wise they are all
basket cases. Without the boost given to them by Europeans during the
colonial period, their people still would be eating each other. Some of
them still are, in fact. And since the Europeans gave up on their
colonies, the Africans have been sliding back down into the jungle. They
are unable to take care of themselves. Whenever a natural disaster
occurs, as with the flooding in Mozambique recently, they are dependent
on help from Whites.
Japan, on the other hand, is very poor in natural resources but
nevertheless is infinitely healthier than any Black country. The
Japanese never ask for outside help from anyone. They take care of
themselves. And despite their lack of minerals they are enormously
wealthy. So what's the secret? Why is Japan so much healthier, so much
more fit, than Mozambique, despite having so much less land and
resources? Well, of course, you already know the answer. It's the
difference in the quality of the people.
For every nation, the one essential determinant of national health is
the quality of the people who make up that nation: their genetic quality
-- which is to say, their racial quality -- and their moral quality.
Everything else, including the state of the economy, ultimately depends
on these two elements. A nation whose population is intelligent,
creative, resourceful, energetic, and able to solve problems and plan
ahead, ultimately will be a healthier nation than one whose people are
dull, lazy, and able to think only about the present, regardless of
mineral wealth or other advantages. Genes are the determining element.
And a nation whose people are disciplined, racially conscious, and
imbued with a strong sense of responsibility will be healthier than a
nation whose people have the same genes but who are accustomed to
permissiveness and self-indulgence and to thinking only about
themselves, who do not feel any sense of belonging to their race or any
sense of responsibility to it. When genes are equal, morality is the
determining element.
Now, with that introduction, let's talk about the immigration situation
in this country. Let's talk about it in a specific and personal way.
Roger Barnett is a rancher in Arizona. He has a cattle ranch in Cochise
County, in southeastern Arizona, near the town of Douglas, which is
right on the Mexican border. Last month, on the afternoon of February
19, driving in his pickup truck along U.S. Highway 80 east of Douglas,
he pulled alongside a van carrying 10 Mexicans. With horn honking and
lights flashing, Barnett forced the van to stop. Determining that all 10
occupants of the van were illegal aliens, Barnett and his brother
performed citizen's arrests of the Mexicans and escorted the van to the
Border Patrol station in Douglas, where they turned the Mexicans over to
the Border Patrol for deportation.
Now, Roger Barnett is not a policeman, and he's not a Border Patrol
agent. He's just a rancher, a private citizen. He'd much rather be
tending to his cattle than rounding up illegal aliens. Yet in the last
two years he estimates that he's arrested more than 1,000 -- more than
1,000 -- illegal aliens on or near his ranch. That's getting close to
two a day, and it doesn't leave him much time for ranching. He's not
paid to apprehend illegal aliens, but he does it because the Border
Patrol is, in effect, paid not to do it. And he does it because the
Mexicans are ruining his ranch. Heading north across his land, they
leave a trail of trash and filth and destroyed vegetation behind them.
Where they camp the ground is littered with debris and human feces. They
cut down Barnett's trees for firewood to build campfires. Empty plastic
bottles, discarded diapers, and other trash are everywhere, posing a
hazard to his cows. The cows will eat plastic trash, and it jams up
their digestive tract and kills them.
It's not just a few Mexicans sneaking across the border. It's a non-stop
flood, an invasion by a huge army. And the Border Patrol, under orders
from the Clinton administration, deliberately lets the invaders come
across the border, only pretending to try to stop them by arresting a
few each day. Those few who are apprehended never are punished or
imprisoned; they are simply sent back across the border to try again.
When Barnett arrested the 10 illegals in the van on February 19, the
Mexican consul in Douglas, Miguel Escobar Valdez, tried to have him
prosecuted for assault and unlawful imprisonment. A lot of other people
also were wringing their hands and moaning about Barnett -- quote --
"taking the law into his own hands."
Local liberals and church spokesmen were complaining that he had
"intimidated" the illegal aliens and "violated their civil rights." The
local prosecuting attorney, Chris Roll, said, and I quote: "This is
conduct we all wish wasn't happening and do not condone, yet we cannot
go forward unless there is sufficient evidence of a crime for a jury to
convict." -- end quote -- What that means in plain language is that the
prosecutor would love to lock Barnett up for trying to keep the illegals
away from his ranch, but he knows that he couldn't get a local jury to
convict him for anything because all of the other ranchers and
businessmen and homeowners in the area sympathize with Barnett, even if
they don't have enough courage to do the same thing themselves. The
liberals are hoping that one of Barnett's arrests of illegals will end
up in a shooting. Then they will yell for Janet Reno, and Barnett will
be prosecuted for a "hate crime."
You know, this goes far beyond the usual liberal bias in favor of the
criminal and against anyone who gets tough with a criminal. The law is
clear. The illegal aliens are breaking U.S. law simply by entering our
country, completely aside from the laws they break after they are in the
country, by trespassing on Barnett's ranch and destroying his property.
The U.S. Border Patrol is charged with keeping them out and with
arresting them if they get in. But the U.S. Border Patrol is under the
jurisdiction of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, and the
Immigration and Naturalization Service is headed by a woman named Doris
Meissner, who, even if she weren't a Jewess, would be carrying out the
policy of the Clinton administration, which is to let anyone into the
country who will strengthen the feminist, Jewish, homosexual, racial
minority, welfare coalition against the normal, healthy,
self-supporting, heterosexual White men and women who used to be
America.
You might think the Republicans would raise hell about this policy, but
they're afraid to. In the first place, they're afraid of being called
"racists" by the media -- and they're afraid that the Mexicans who're
legally in the country will vote against them if they're seen as
anti-immigrant. Of course, nearly all of those votes go to the Democrats
anyway, but the Republicans believe that the Mexicans will continue
swarming into the country because they think that Americans just aren't
tough-minded enough to support the firm policies required to halt the
flood, and so instead of trying to keep them out the Republicans are
trying to out-Democrat the Democrats in being nice to them.
The fact is that the government could halt all illegal immigration
immediately, and I mean today, if it wanted to, simply by announcing
that anyone attempting to cross the border illegally would be shot on
sight and then demonstrating that we meant it. That would do it. We
could spend the next three months building an adequate set of fences,
installing intrusion sensors, and so on. But just shooting a few hundred
illegals the first day would be enough to stop the flood. It wouldn't
require any more resources than the Border Patrol is using now. All of
the excuses we hear about the government not being able to afford enough
Border Patrol agents to patrol the border, and that it's impossible to
keep the Mexicans from climbing the fences we build or cutting through
them or burrowing under them, are simply lies. We could stop them all in
a day with almost no effort.
Of course, the liberals and the Jews in the media and the Christian
churches would wail long and loud if the government actually got serious
about protecting our borders. The government would have to be prepared
to deal with them. But of course, the government isn't about to begin
protecting our borders.
Our real problem is that we don't have enough Roger Barnetts. And we
don't have enough people who really understand how bad the problem is.
The ranchers along the border understand. They see the size of the
flood, and they also see the appalling lack of human quality among those
who make up the flood. In the rest of the country, the perception is not
as clear -- but it is becoming clearer as the mestizos continue pouring
in. Communities which ten years ago had only a relatively small Mexican
problem -- and which 20 years ago had no Mexicans at all -- are finding
themselves overwhelmed by the Mexican invasion today, and these
communities being overrun by mestizos are not just along the border:
they are all over the country. The big agribusiness tycoons are
importing them by the hundreds of thousands for farm labor, for work in
poultry plants, and for other low-wage work, and the Clinton government
is pretending not to notice. One of the worst offenders is Bill
Clinton's bosom buddy and financial supporter, Arkansas
chicken-processing billionaire Donald Tyson, of Tyson Foods.
As I said, the mestizo problem is spreading all over the country. Last
month my organization, the National Alliance, organized a public
demonstration in Siler City, North Carolina, to protest the government's
refusal to arrest and deport illegal aliens. Ten years ago Siler City, a
little town of about 6,000 residents, was almost entirely White. Today
it is 40 per cent Mexican, because two poultry processing plants in the
town have been bringing mestizo workers in, and the Immigration and
Naturalization Service has done nothing to stop them. The government
ignores its own laws, and because of this the mestizo population of the
state of North Carolina has doubled in the past decade.
And let me tell you, the people do not like this. In communities such as
Siler City, which have been especially badly impacted by the mestizo
invasion, the people are angry. They don't like it that the schools,
which were built with their taxes, and used to be clean and safe and
White, now are overrun with Mexicans. They don't like it that the drug
problem and the gang problem and the crime problem and a dozen other big
problems which came along with the Mexicans have made their town a far
less pleasant place to live. Like John Rocker, they prefer their
neighbors to be White and to speak English. Of course, the agribusiness
tycoons -- the Donald Tysons -- don't really care what they prefer. And
clearly, the government doesn't either.
When the National Alliance was demonstrating in Siler City last month,
the White citizens were on our side, and the media, the politicians, and
the preachers were on the Mexican side. The media are on the Mexican
side because multiculturalizing the country -- destroying the White
majority -- is a deliberate policy with the media bosses. The
politicians are on the Mexican side because the agribusiness tycoons and
the media bosses are. The agribusiness people slip them money, the way
Donald Tyson used to slip money to Bill Clinton in Arkansas, and they
know that if the media bosses turn against them they'll never be allowed
to win another election. Furthermore, they don't think the White
citizens have the will to stop the invasion. The preachers are on the
Mexican side because to them a Brown soul is as good as a White one. The
churches had a few counter-demonstrators in Siler City carrying signs
with slogans such as, "God sees no borders" and "The only race is the
human race."
Now, to return to the subject of national health: the mestizo invasion
of the United States clearly is making a profound impact on the genetic
constitution of our population. Our inability to stop this invasion is a
clear indicator that our moral health already has suffered a profound
impact. We need a million Roger Barnetts, and we have only a handful.
The rest of the people who agree with him are too intimidated by the
media to speak out. No, it's worse than that: they are too cowardly to
speak out.
Silicon Valley may be keeping the economy zooming along for now, but
that is only a superficial sign of health, a misleading sign. America is
like a man whose body is riddled with cancer, but who still manages to
keep his shoes shined and his fingernails clean. Genetically, our health
is declining fast. The government's Census Bureau estimates that
somewhere between 30 and 50 years from now the mestizos and the Blacks
together will outnumber the Whites. That doesn't bother the preachers,
of course. And it doesn't bother the agribusiness tycoons, who figure
that the cost of labor should be lower than ever. And it doesn't bother
the politicians, so long as they still can count on their place at the
public trough. And it pleases mightily the Jewish media bosses and their
liberal camp followers, who have been striving for that goal all along.
But having their grandchildren growing up in a country where Blacks and
mestizos will outnumber them, a country with the sort of society that
Blacks and mestizos will transform our society into -- a society of
barrios and drugs and brutality and all-pervading corruption -- that
should concern decent, intelligent White people. And it does concern
them, when they're not too busy using their credit cards at the shopping
mall or watching the ball game on TV. I mean they know that is what is
in store for America. They know that we will have a society which is a
cross between that in Zambia and that in Nicaragua, the sort of society
that Blacks and mestizos always create. The Census Bureau has announced
it. The Jews and liberals are gloating in anticipation.
The fact that they know what is being done to America, they know what is
ahead for their grandchildren, and they haven't risen up in righteous
fury and hanged every politician and every media boss and every
agribusiness tycoon is medical proof that morally the country already is
dead and beginning to stink.
Can a nation which is morally dead save itself from dying genetically as
well? Are there still enough Roger Barnetts among us to turn the tide?
Well, if I believed that it couldn't be done, I wouldn't be talking with
you today. But I would appreciate some help. So would Mr. Barnett.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADVlist.
To subscribe to ADVlist, send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" as the subject of the message to: ADVlist@NatVan.com
For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
http://www.natall.com.
==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. This
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to be
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup posting.
To contact us, write to:
National Vanguard Books
Attention: ADVlist
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro, WV 24946
or e-mail: national@NatVan.com please tell us if we can post your
comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address
given.
--> TO BE REMOVED from ADVlist, send an e-mail message to:
ADVlist@NatVan.com which has "unsubscribe" as the subject of the
message.
(c) 2000 National Vanguard Books
.
Over to Martin Lindstedt's Church&State Theocracy WWW page
Back to Patrick Henry On-Line
Back to The Thought 4 The Day
Back to Stuff I Wish I Wrote -- But Didn't
.