Dear Doug:2005 Public Domain -- provided credit given to Eric Thompson and www.martinlindstedt.org.
Many thanks for your letter of FEB 13th & enclosures! Whites definitely lack an ideology, especially the rule of asking ourselves, "Is this good for Whites?" What is simple is often difficult. How do we 'sell' a pro-White ideology, which includes racial improvement, as well as racial survival? I have attempted to interest Whites in such a program for decades in Africa, Europe, Canada & the U.S.A. As you point out, there is a definite lack of results, so far.
We are not alone in using appeals to reason, baesd on scientific evidence, to promote ideas of obvious benefit to Whites. These appeals tend to be met by emotional arguments on the part of ostensible Whites, as well as non-Whites, such as jews. As you say, they must be convinced that they are doing the right thing, & that's just for starters, for many people persist in doing the wrong things, even when they know what is right. There is a great deal of emotional & material inertia, even in these days of light baggage & fast transportation. As I understand, from personal experience: Instinct rules our emotions, & our emotions rule our reason. Intelligence is revealed when one can best & most efficiently satisfy his instincts, for reason & intelligence are just tools. I have always loved classical music, in comparison to other types. Why I do, I don't know. Maybe it's because I'm White. My reason is thus applied so as to obtain maximum exposure to classical music. But what if I were indoctrinated to believe that classical music was 'wrong," because it was "Nazi"? Our instincts may be used against us, & our emotions distorted, so as to put our reason at the service of our enemies. This has happened throughout the ages, as with the introduction of Christianity & feudalism into the White lands of Europe, for the enslavement of the many, & the benefit of the minority. This may explain the thinking of the majority of Whites.
Onoe writer asked, "How low must we stoop to advance?" In other words, how 'popular' must we make our message in conventional, current terms of reference? At this moment, we cannot even persuade the 'choir' to sing the same song. We are 'too radical,' but radical thoughts are required in radical situations. As Hitler said, "I speak with the eloquence of emergency." The 3 major differences I perceive amongst pro-White Whites are:
(1) White Supremacism: this follows the old KKK model, in which anyone with a pale skin is placed above non-Whites, despite their merit. In other words, dysgenic pale faces 'should' rule over the best specimens of other races, with the consequent sharing of living-space, & the inevitable race-mixing that occurs under such circumstances. Strom Thurmond was a testimony about what's wrong with "White Supremacy," having fathered a mulatto child. "White Supremacy" is not relevant to racial improvement, & is, in fact, dysgenic.The FRONTLINE material you sent me is certainly relevant and informative, but I would add that we currently live under ZOG, which uses any excuse to break up White communities, especially by its laws. Land ownership is no guarantee that people will be allowed to live in separation from the non-Whites, for freedom of association is forbidden to Whites, under ZOG. Schooling is one avenue of ZOG-incursion, to which home-schooling is a good defence, ZOG permitting. At this stage, I would recommend the sort of secrecy in the formation of White communities as achieved by the "Travellers," who are of Irish descent. They were eventually denounced by a traitoress who was adopted into their community & whose denunciations were publicized by the jewsmedia. She did her worst to destroy that community, but I've heard nothing since. Under ZOG, even one traitor can destroy a community.
(2) White separatism; This does not imply the creation of a White nation-state, but racial separation in terms of livingspace. The weakness in this bare bones idea is that people need something positive, not merely the absence or the negation of that which oppresses them. As you point out, the creation of a White community would logically follow the creation of a White living-space, but would it? As I see things, Whites lack their own communities, largely because they lack community spirit: one for all & all for one. This defect is largely due to lack of common values, especially amongst the Majority of Whites. Putting such Whites into a specific area is no guarantee that they will not recreate the very blight from which they fled. I see this going on here in the Northwest. More Whites means more competition for land & jobs, plus more non-White aliens. This is a movement minus separation & minus co-operation, which precludes White Community. As it now stands, White Flight is not White Separatism.
(3) White Nationalism = ORION! = OUR RACE IS OUR NATION! This ideology is positive, for it is the presence of a movement toward a goal, rather than a mere attempt to flee one's oppressors. Nationhood exists first in the mind, as an idea which becomes manifest in the material world, as cathedrals were material manifestations of the Christian ideology. Nation is people, not place, despite jewish culture-distortion in this regard. For a people to obtain a place for members of their nation, they must first think of themselves as a nation. When Whites can do this, their behavior will change accordingly. Only nationhood can give Whites freedom from, plus freedom to. When the idea of White Nationhood is assimiliated, then Form will follow Function. Before that, nothing.
Another problem is that of property ownership. Who would own the White Separatists' land? Would it be a corporation? If so, who would own that? I have seen people lose their property becaues of the actions of one person, as did Pastor Butler of Aryan Nations. This is why the ownership of land by a single entity is vulnerable to ZOG-attack via the jewdicial system. If the land is to be parceled out to community members, as in a subdivision of private owners, would there be any guarantee that one or more owners would not sell their land to some ZOG-agents? The FRONTLINE papers describe farming as the primary activity of the White Separatist settlers. This is laudable, but is it possible? How many Whites have any background in farming, & how many would be willing to perform such demanding labor? Out here in the NW "Great White Hopeland", we are virtually surrounded by Indian reservations, which are deemed "sovereign nations" by treaty. In the Yakima area, the Injuns (who are really mestizos or Eurasians) command the river fishing. They can & do deprive White farmers of their water 'rights,' & they can restrict White usage of land off the reservations under "environmental protection laws" plus treaty rights. "Environmental Impact Studies" are now required in many parts of the U.S.A. in regard to farming, especially when non-farming neighbors are involved. There have been many protests against dairy-farming recently, & I suspect that the anti-milk protestors are racially unable to digest milk.
Along with the population explosion & forested areas, so one's neighbors may be close, non-White & obnoxious. Indians are permitted to wander around private property in terms of their treaty rights, in many areas. These factors bear checking out, before one puts his money down on a parcel of land, which should never, ever, be bought sight unseen. Unfortunately, I have met several "Norwegians" who are dark, dysgenic mestizos from Minnesota, so there is no "Shangri La" in which one can escape the darkies, it appears, under ZOG. On the positive side, I have read that there are small colonies of engineers who work for Boeing, et al. via computer, from their self-sufficient homes in the boonies. This still indicates that they are in the ZOG's cash economy, so they are by no means independent of ZOG rule. Perhaps it is a beginning, but it all depends on White Will & non-White presence in any area.
In regard to scientific religiions, I can recommend two: Dynasophy & Cosmotheism. They have their own websites. James Hart, who is running for congress in Kentucky, has similar religious views which incorporate eugenics. I'll send this information to XX, so as to avoid possible censorship by your ZOG-gulag meisters, as occurs often with other P.O.W. correspondents of mine. They even seize jewspaper articles, when they please. That indicates they are "anti-Semitic." Ha! I define an "anti-Semite" as one who kills or hurts Arabs, as well as one who steals a Semitic religion & thereby claims to be a "Semite." Typical Semitic religions are Judaism, Christianity & Islam. Non-Arabs have no business infecting themselves with them, nor should they attempt to infect others.
Like you, I've been wrestling with ideas of how we may popularize the pro-White message amongst the majority of Whites, who so far appear indifferent to their racial & personal survival. I ask them, do lemmings find safety in numbers? One thing in our favor, as strange as it may seem, is the advent of non-White nationalism, along with the ZOG's granting of privileges to non-Whites, based on their status as non-White racial & ethnic groups. Equal rights for Whites, should be our slogan, as well as 'majority rule.' After all, that was the ZOG's slogan in Africa. The U.S.A. has never had majority rule, for it was never designed to be a democracy, according to its founding felons. This is why I support the Anti-Zionist Alliance, which includes anti-Zionist non-Whites. This network seeks to co-ordinate anti-ZOG policies on behalf of the general good; not merely on behalf of Whites. Zionism or jew-supremacy is our current & most pressing misfortune, as you know. Along with White apathy & active support for Zionism, these are our foremost enemies. Our message is simple & direct: Is this good for Whites?
Keep up the good work. All the best!
DOWZ! & ORION!
Over to DOWZ.net
Back to The DOWZ-Net Mirror Index
Back to The Thought 4 The Day
Back to Stuff I Wish I Had Written -- But Didn't -- Resistance Columnists
Back to Patrick Henry On-Line or www.martinlindstedt.org