From: James Floyd [mailto:jfloyd@airnet.net]
Sent: Friday, February 05, 1999 9:20 AM
Subject: Two Charlies, Shakespeare and Judge Jones
This missive is not about abortion, neither was this so-called trial:
PORTLAND, Oregon (CNN) -- A federal jury decided
Tuesday that a controversial Web site and "wanted"
posters amounted to death threats against doctors who
perform abortions. More than a dozen defendants were
ordered to pay damages of more than $100 million.
[U.S. District Judge Robert E. Jones presiding]
It was, in fact, yet another attack upon what little remains of our
Constitution and our once cherished rights of freespeech and
expression. Also, everything about this loony-tunes litigation, from
the imbecility of Jones to the jury's obvious propensity for life in
the twilight-zone, speaks volumes about a system of justice (?) which
will continue to float about in the toilet bowl until we gain the
courage to flush it down.
Judges are lawyers, judges are lawyers whom other lawyers push-off
on voters for election, judges are lawyers with low-income practices
because the smart, high-income, successful lawyers don't want the
damn job, so, from Cullman, Alabama to Portland, Oregon we get
judges who were not intelligent enough to build a profitable firm yet
process acumen sufficient for finding the court house, manipulating
equally inept juries and pleasing those who determine their (the
judge's) chances at getting that all important retirement check. And
federal judges, who are appointed for life rather than elected, (read
political pay-back) fare no better - the system insures that we are
judged by the village idiots of the legal community.
Next, when these judges go completely bananas, when their rulings
and conduct in court are so blatantly, painfully unjust that an
appeals clerk rules that they must reverse themselves, well, there is
no punishment. Nobody takes these buffoons outside, puts their heads
in stocks, pulls-up their stupid robes and whips their silly butts.
There are no recriminations for the judicially insane. May God
damn these dishonorable courts!
Two Charlies
One of the defendants in this case, Charlie Wysong and his brother
Harvey, visited here a few weeks ago and I found them to be anything
but irrational radicals, or terroristic, or immoderate, or a threat to
anyone. Nor could a reasonable person adjudge them as violent or
promoters of violence. Nor were they deranged - I'm deranged, hell!
I know deranged!
We talked about the other Charlie, ex-Congressman now Senator
Charlie Schumer. This Khazar mamzer has for years been the point
man in an overt, Bolshevik attack against our treasured precepts of
freedom and justice. The twisted, alien wording of the bills signed
by him and his co-Khazar faggot buddy, Barney Frank, condemn them
both. You be the judge, America.
Some of the following became part of HR 1710, all are authentic
and represent an infestation tantamount to giving blind Lady Justice
a seaport disease.
Schumer called me and others "Fax terrorist" and
devised a law which would make it illegal to say bad
things to or about him;
"unlawful to intimidate or coerce or appear to intend
to influence an official to achieve political or social
goals." (letters, words?)
Then came his ideas of 'ex parte' trials (one side
only, one-sided evidence) and 'in camera'
(trials in secret)
Then he advanced the totally foreign concept of
arrest if one, "appeared to intend to commit a crime."
This law, he reasoned, would put an early end to a
multitude of undesirable contrarians.
Now comes the Schumeric insanity that insinuated this
beastly little piece of Khazar crap into the Portland
courtroom:
"INTENTIONAL ADVOCACY"
This charge of 'intentional advocacy' involves saying things or
showing pictures, or otherwise conveying thoughts that may or may
not be acted upon by the "deranged" or feeble-minded, wherein the
advocate of an idea becomes as guilty as the perpetrator of a crime.
An inspiring sermon, a belligerent sentence from a book or maybe
even a wink and a grin becomes irrefutable proof of complicity in
murder or other crimes.
Well! Well! Well now! Perhaps, it is time for this ole terrorist-
in-waiting to confess, to fess-up and rat-on those who implanted
such horrid, bellicose ideas in me head. A total list would be
unmanageable, so after much soul-searching I have decided that the
paramount villain whose inspirations propelled me into a life of
thought-crimes was non-other than William Shakespeare -- the
evidence speaks for its self;
Cade: (paraphrased)
Be brave Jim, for your captain is brave and vows
reformation. We gonna cut the price of bread down
to near nothing. Ye gonna eat out of big pots and
drink only king-sized beers. Ye horse will eat royal
grass on the cheap... When I am King...
Dick "THE FIRST THING WE DO, LET'S KILL ALL
THE LAWYERS!"
All: God save your majesty.
from King Henry VI, part 2
My good Lord God in heaven!, save me judge Jones from these
unreasonable influences. Let's get Mo Dees to file a multi-million
dollar law suit against all the Shakespearean Theaters, take their
properties and ruin them. Get Schumer to appoint a committee and
special prosecutor and fund a study by some Ivy League college
(Shakespeare and red-neck crime?). Give the FBI/BATF authority to
kick-down doors and search and seize. We could even hire the ADL
to compile a list of hold-outs and give the JDL razor blades with
which to cut offensive pages from library books and deal with
stubborn librarians.
Save me judge, save me from meself. Stop me before I think again!
Jim Floyd
.
Back to Patrick Henry On-Line
Back to The Thought 4 The Day
Back to Stuff I Wish I Wrote -- But Didn't
.