Order Establishing Rules for the Trial

Feb. 28, 1997

.

.


      IN THE UNITED DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
          WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI            Filed Feb. 28, 1997
              CENTRAL DIVISION                        4:15 p.m.


MARTIN LINDSTEDT,             ) 
                              )
            Plaintiff,        )
	    v.	              )	     No. 96-4262-CV-C-9
                              )
MISSOURI LIBERTARIAN PARTY,   )
et al.,                       )
                              )                      
           Defendants.        )



          ORDER ESTABLISHING RULES FOR THE TRIAL 

Rule 611, Federal Rules of Evidence, states:

       The Court shall exercise reasonable control 
       over the mode and order of interrogation of 
       witnesses and presentation of evidence so as 
       to (1) make the interrogation and presentation 
       effective for the ascertainment of the truth,
       (2)  avoid needless consumption of time, and
       (3)  protect witnesses from harassment or undue 
       embarrassment.

   Because I believe that the following rules will contribute 

to accomplishing the purposes set forth in Rule 611,  the 

following rules and procedures will be in effect during the 

trial of this case:

    1.	During voir dire, I will ask questions to confirm that 

each panel member is qualified to serve as a juror in this 

court.  I will introduce the parties and counsel, will read a 

summary of what the case is about, will read a list of possible 

witnesses, and will ask each panel member to speak about the 

panel member's educational background, work history,  family 

(including spouse's employment,  if any) and what the panel 

member does in his/her spare time.


ORIGINAL                    1                   DOC # 28



   2.  At the conclusion of my questioning, each attorney will 

have up to 30 minutes to ask questions of the jury panel or 

individual panel members.  An attorney may ask questions of an 

individual panel member if necessary to follow up on a previous 

answer.  In addition, counsel may ask appropriate questions from 

the attorney's list of voir dire questions so long as the 

provisions of ¶ 3 have been complied with.

   3.  Prior to the final pretrial conference, counsel should 

advise all opposing counsel specifically which questions counsel 

will ask from the list of voir dire questions filed pursuant to 

pretrial orders.   Any objection to a voir dire question an 

opposing attorney plans to ask should be discussed between 

counsel prior to the beginning of the final pretrial conference.

   4.  In addition, counsel shall make an effort to agree on a 

brief written summary of what this case is about.  See ¶ 1. 

(Usually a paragraph briefly summarizing each party's claims or 

defenses expressed as the party's contentions works best). 

Counsel shall bring this summary to the final pretrial conference.

   5.  Counsel shall not ask any question such as:  "Is there any 

reason at all that you will be unable to be a fair and 

impartial juror in this case?" I will ask at least two 

questions of this type after counsel have examined the panel.

   6.  Opening statements are limited to 30 minutes per party.

   7.  No visual aid or exhibit shall be used during an opening 

statement unless opposing counsel has been shown the visual aid

                              2


or exhibit and has agreed that the item may be used during the 

opening statement.

   8.  The interrogation of each witness shall consist of direct 

examination; cross-examination; re-direct examination; 

and re-cross examination.   No further questioning will be 

permitted except by leave of court in extraordinary circumstanc-

es.

   9.  The direct examination of each witness shall be no 

longer than 60 minutes except by leave of court for good cause 

shown.  Cross-examination shall be no longer than direct. Re- 

direct shall be no longer than 20 minutes.  Re-cross shall be 

no longer than re-direct.

   10. Only one attorney per party may examine a witness.  See 

Local Rule 4.

   11. Witnesses shall be interrogated from a reasonable 

distance and shall not be badgered.

   12.	Except in unusual circumstances, a witness should be 

allowed to complete an answer.

   13.	If you want a "yes" or "no" answer, you can anticipate 

that I will allow the witness to explain a "yes" or "no" answer.

   14.	Except in unusual circumstances, an attorney should 

stand when addressing the court or when examining a witness. 

See Local Rule 4.

   15.	When making an objection, an attorney should say only 

"objection"  or "objection" plus the legal reason for the 

objection, e.g., leading, hearsay,  etc.   If the objecting 

attorney desires to give reasons for the objection or if an

                             3



opposing attorney desires to oppose the objection, the attorney 

shall request leave to approach the bench.

   16.	Unless permission is granted before the trial begins, 

a maximum of two expert witnesses shall be allowed to testify 

for any party.  An expert's testimony shall be limited to the 

content of the expert's report furnished pursuant to Rule 

26(a)(2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  See Sylla-Sawdon v. 

Uniroyal, 47 F.3d 277, 281-84 (8th Cir. 1995).

   17.	After you question an expert about his/her qualifica-

tions, DO NOT ask me to declare the witness an expert.

   18.	Each party shall mark each exhibit prior to trial with 

an exhibit sticker which can be obtained from the Clerk of the 

Court.   Exhibits shall be marked only with the designation 

"P.Ex." or "D.Ex." or "P___Ex." or "D   EX." followed by a 

number.  Letters shall not be included as part of the designa-

tion.   The designation for each exhibit shall match the 

designation for that exhibit on the exhibit list furnished to 

the clerk before trial.  Each exhibit must be described with 

reasonable specificity on the exhibit list.

   19.	Visible reactions to the testimony of witnesses or to 

an attorney's presentation such as facial or body gestures are 

inappropriate.

   20.	Please take care not to converse with your client so 

that your conversation can be heard by the jury.

   21.	Counsel may approach the witness for any legitimate 

purpose without requesting permission to do so.


                          4



   22.	If a podium is provided, counsel may use it but are not 

required to do so.  Counsel may question a witness from any 

reasonable place in the courtroom except from a place that would 

intrude into the jury's space.  No paper or object shall be 

placed on the railing in front of the jury box.

   23.	The length of closing arguments will be established 

during the instruction conference.

   24.	Instructions will be read to the jury before closing 

arguments.  Each juror will be given a copy of the instructions 

for use during closing arguments and during deliberations.

   25.	After the jury retires, each side shall assemble their 

exhibits and keep them available in the courtroom.

  26.	Counsel  and their clients  should remain  in  the 

courthouse and advise my staff where they will be while the jury 

is deliberating.

  27.  After the jury returns its verdict, be prepared to tell 

me if you want the jury polled.

  28.  After the jury is dismissed, each attorney must take 

possession of his/her exhibits from the courtroom deputy and 

sign the receipt at the bottom of the exhibit list.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


                             -s-
                            ___________________________
                            D. BROOK BARTLETT 
                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Kansas City, Missouri 
February _28_, 1997.


                           5



.

.

Comments: The best thing about a judge like above, is that Bartlett can take the Local Rules and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and make them simple enough so that even an idiot like LawyerMore can understand what the trial is all about. Regrettably for me, Bartlett is making it easier for LawyerMore to wing it, without having his feeble mind strained by having to read lawbooks, hence negating in large part my greater intelligence and experience.

Most federal judges, like Dean Whipple on the same circuit, aren't as honest or competent.

.


.

Back to Lindstedt v. the MoLP-PP, the Federal Lawsuit or
Patrick Henry On-Line

.